---
title: A Biochemist's Novel Imagines the Sense Humans Lost When Speech Began
description: Biochemist Christer Jansson's Genes of the Past uses a fictional 550,000-year-old Moroccan fossil to propose a sense ancient hominins lost when spoken words ...
author: Dr Marina Nani (Editor-in-Chief)
date: 2026-04-13T12:32:58.137Z
updated: 2026-06-29T08:43:56.305Z
canonical: https://www.sovereignmagazine.com/article/genes-of-the-past-christer-jansson-lost-sense
image: https://cdn.nanimediahouse.com/genes-of-the-past-featured.webp
categories: Fiction
content_type: Book Review
region: United Kingdom
publication: Rich Books
---

Most fiction about human origins fills in the gaps we already know about. Christer Jansson, a biochemist with a career as a lead scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley and Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, wrote a novel about a gap we do not yet know is there. His book, Genes of the Past, proposes that somewhere in the switch from gesture to grammar, early hominins lost an entire sense that once let them share mental pictures as directly as we now share sentences.

### Book: Genes of the Past
*A novel*
By Christer Jansson

Biochemist Christer Jansson's debut novel treats a fictional 550,000-year-old hominin fossil from central Morocco as the physical evidence of a sensory ability our ancestors may have lost when spoken language began replacing mental images. Told in documentary style from the point of view of a biochemist at a US national lab, the novel uses real molecular biology to build a plausible case for a lost human sense, threaded through a mystery that crosses continents and centuries.

[Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/dp/1917095724)

The story opens in Richland, Washington, inside a fictional national lab, and keeps returning to central Morocco, where in 1967 a stooped Austrian birdwatcher nicknamed Fat Man trips over a buried skull while chasing a falcon. The narrator, a biochemist at the lab, is handed the cranium decades later. His team is running protein analysis on preserved tissue from its lower nasal cavity. What they pull out looks familiar and strange at the same time. The proteins belong to the G protein coupled receptor family. They look like olfactory receptors. They do not match any olfactory receptor catalogued in any living or extinct species. The fossil is dated to 550,000 years ago and named Homo crassus, a fictional species sitting in the lineage between Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis, and closer to the real Jebel Irhoud site than is comfortable for the narrator.

## The receptors that do not fit anything we have on file

Jansson sets up the puzzle carefully. Olfactory receptors are a real thing. They make up the single largest family of genes in the mammalian genome, and they all belong to the same broader receptor family that handles most of the signals flowing into our cells. The human nose uses them to recognize thousands of airborne molecules, and the olfactory bulb routes those signals straight into the amygdala and hippocampus. That wiring is the reason a smell can pull back a decade-old memory faster than a word can. Of all the senses, smell is the one plugged most directly into emotion and recall.

Jansson's fictional receptors fit none of the known patterns. They are the right shape and the right family, but the amino acid positions that decide which molecules they lock onto are in the wrong places. The book's narrator keeps returning to the same question. If these receptors were not tuned to any odor we know about, what were they tuned to?

## The sense that went quiet

The answer the novel builds toward comes from a second character, an eccentric English linguist named John Smith, who has spent forty years on a hypothesis nobody was willing to publish. Before speech became fluent enough to carry the work of communication on its own, Smith thinks hominins used a different way of sensing each other. He calls it mind viewing. In his hypothesis, the brain of one hominin gave off signals, something like chemical or energy particles, and the brain of another hominin picked them up through a dedicated sensory bulb modeled on the olfactory bulb. The receiver did not hear a word for tiger. They saw a tiger.

Smith's reasoning is the part of the book where speculation and real science press closest together. He argues that any brain-to-brain sensing would almost have to run through G protein coupled receptors, because that is the family the human body already uses for most of its sensory input. He argues that it would feed into the limbic system, because that is where the olfactory bulb already lives, and because mental imagery and olfaction already share more real estate in the brain than most people realize. And he argues that once [spoken language](https://richbooksmagazine.com/article/the-power-of-words-the-science-behind-and-the-cultures-that-created-them) became rich enough to carry meaning on its own, the sense would fade. Nature is not sentimental about unused equipment. Receptors no one used would shrink, rearrange, and eventually go quiet. The only place you could still find the original version would be in a skull old enough to predate the transition.

Fat Man is old enough.

## Why the premise keeps its footing

Jansson is not the first writer to imagine [pre-speech hominins communicating in images](https://richbooksmagazine.com/article/from-cave-walls-to-cyber-walls-beyond-the-power-of-mind-story-and-neuroplasticity). William Golding's The Inheritors reached for something similar in 1955 by giving Neanderthals a quiet telepathic undercurrent. What Jansson adds is seventy years of molecular biology. Rather than treating the idea as a mood, he asks what physical hardware it would have to run on. His answer lands on the one family of receptors that already deals with chemistry, memory, and emotion at once.

The novel resists the temptation to resolve the question too cleanly. At every turn, another character points out what the science cannot yet prove. Protein survival in a skull that old is a stretch. A receptor sequence alone cannot tell you what the receptor was for. The narrator is aware that he is chasing an answer that may not be testable in his lifetime, and the book treats that uncertainty as part of the story rather than a flaw to paper over.

## What the book is really asking

Genes of the Past is structured as a documentary, with chapters that double as lab notes and travel diaries. It reads like a thought experiment a working scientist might run in the private hours between experiments he is actually allowed to perform. That framing is landing with readers. One retired scientist reviewing the book on Amazon called the premise far-fetched and a bit technical but said the conversational presentation clearly showed the human side of scientists and grew delightful as the story progressed. Another reader said the book had them hooked by page three. Readers who come to it for hominin evolution and speculative science fiction will find plot mechanics enough to keep the pages turning, but the pull of the book is the question it rests on.

What if [the cognitive trade we made for speech](https://richbooksmagazine.com/article/dan-mrejeru-speakingman-evolution-human-intelligence) was bigger than we know. What if fluency cost us [a sense we no longer remember having](https://richbooksmagazine.com/article/nature-s-ai-the-54-hidden-senses-that-can-calm-your-mind-and-help-you-heal), and the only record is sitting in skulls we have already catalogued and shelved.

**About Christer Jansson**
Biochemist and novelist

Christer Jansson is a biochemist and the author of Genes of the Past, a documentary-style science thriller that treats a fictional 550,000-year-old Moroccan fossil as the physical evidence of a sensory ability lost to the ancestors of modern humans. Jansson had a career as a lead scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory before turning to fiction. His debut was published by Starry-Eyed Press in 2023.

[Website](https://christertuffing.com/)

## FAQ

**Q: Did early humans have a sixth sense?**
There is no direct evidence that any hominin species had a sense beyond the five we recognize today, but the human sensory repertoire has clearly shrunk over time. Modern humans carry hundreds of broken olfactory receptor genes, which means our ancestors could smell things we no longer can. Researchers have also documented reductions in color perception range, taste receptor diversity, and several chemical-sensing abilities other primates still use. Whether any of those losses amounted to something we would recognize as a separate sense is still an open question.

**Q: What are olfactory receptors and what do they do?**
Olfactory receptors are proteins on the surface of cells in the nose that detect airborne molecules. They belong to the G protein coupled receptor family, which is the largest single family of genes in the human genome. When an odor molecule binds to one of these receptors, it triggers a signal that travels through the olfactory bulb and into the limbic system, the part of the brain that handles memory and emotion. That direct wiring is why a smell can trigger a vivid memory faster than a word or an image can.

**Q: Could humans speak 10,000 years ago?**
Yes. Anatomically modern humans have had the vocal tract and cognitive equipment for complex speech for well over 100,000 years, and there is strong evidence that spoken language was already in everyday use long before the first writing systems appeared around 5,500 years ago. What researchers still debate is when speech became the dominant channel for communication, how many spoken languages existed at any given time, and how quickly vocabularies expanded as populations grew.

**Q: Can humans communicate without words?**
Most human communication already is non-verbal. Facial expression, tone of voice, posture, gesture, eye contact, and context carry a large share of meaning in any conversation. Studies of in-person interaction suggest that the wording alone usually accounts for less than half of what the listener actually takes away. Humans also share information through touch, through shared attention on objects, and through implicit social cues that neither speaker nor listener consciously registers.